I used to be really pro gun-control, back when I was a card-carrying Democrat. I don’t think I ever put much thought to the issue, except that the idea of everyone walking around with guns seemed frightening. I shot pistols and shotguns and rifles as a kid, but I’ve never had the desire to own one myself.
Anyway, in the wake of the horror at Virginia Tech this past week, I’ve been reading a lot about what people have to say about guns. As a libertarian, I don’t have an issue with a university banning guns on the premises, although I think it’s a bad idea. A no-guns allowed policy doesn’t guarantee a killing spree, but it certainly makes it easier. If you don’t believe me, read about how many similar incidents ended differently because of armed civilian resistance.
What I’ve often heard in response to this week’s violence is a generic call for more gun control. But imagine a world in which owing a firearm was not only illegal, but impossible. Meaning that government enforcement of the law was so efficient (please, use your imagination for this exercise) that nobody was able to find a gun on the black market. Imagine a world where only the police and Mr. Bush have the guns. Does that feel safe to you? It feels like a dictatorship to me.
Come to think of it, that’s exactly how things were, gun-wise, in Orwell’s 1984. They couldn’t have revolted even if they wanted to, for a total lack of firepower.
Now, removing your ‘imagination cap’, we realize that the government is not efficient and that even with all guns outlawed, their would still be a thriving black market. A black market where only criminals, by definition, would purchase firearms. So, in addition to Mr. Bush and the police, you can add criminals to the classes of people owing guns. Does that make you feel safer?
Share This